so this agenda thing.

[George Hannah]

Here's the SS contemptible hack crew with another despicable attack on City this morning. Total disrespect for us contrasts with their earlier consensus that the Swamp dwellers were now heading for a top three finish or higher - quite shocking really, who else do we have to beat to a fair crack

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgtxSPgulhM&feature=youtu.be[/video]

 

[everythingchangesbutblue]

Here's the SS contemptible hack crew with another despicable attack on City this morning. Total disrespect for us contrasts with their earlier consensus that the Swamp dwellers were now heading for a top three finish or higher - quite shocking really, who else do we have to beat to a fair crack

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgtxSPgulhM&feature=youtu.be[/video]

Disgusting, not one positive about our club, no doubt 1 or 2 "blues" will be along shortly telling us there was nothing wrong with what they said.

 

[city saint]

they"re full of shit.

 

[Blue Punter]

Southampton vs Manchester City: Sergio Aguero is keeping Manuel Pellegrini in a job

Indy subs keeping on message

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/southampton-vs-manchester-city-sergio-aguero-is-keeping-manuel-pellegrini-in-a-job-9893051.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 93051.html</a>

They never let up. I see no one had the balls to put their name to that pile of shite.

Good as he is, the "Aguero - one man team" line needs to be put in perspective.

The two trophies we won last season, he played in 25 of those 43 games, just over 58%.

 

[rushts]

I thought they were spot on in that article ^^ ????

















You think i'm going to waste 5mins of my life watching those fucking idiots lol ;-)

 

[rushts]

Seriously need a good win today. If we win this 'head to head',then surely we are going to get some positive journalism? They're drooling over this one. We lose this and they are going to go for the jugular.

 

[Blue Punter]

I thought they were spot on in that article ^^ ????

What did you believe to be spot on?

Here's my take on the article.

Headline - If Aguero was not playing, Pellers would be sacked.

Para 2. The phrases "Had Aguero not struck..." & "Pellegrini’s position as manager might have become untenable". Why are they consistently writing negative hypotheticals?

Para 3.

But for Aguero’s hat-trick against Bayern, City would not have qualified from their group

Again another negative hypothesis, this time double whammied by being totally inaccurate.

Para 3.

The name of Atletico Madrid’s manager, Diego Simeone, is being increasingly mentioned around the Etihad.

- By whom exactly?

Not one mention of the substitutions made by the manager which led to Jovetic setting up the two goals.

Once again, we're subjected to more conjectural, negative bullshit.

 

[Centurions]

I thought they were spot on in that article ^^ ????

What did you believe to be spot on?

Here's my take on the article.

Headline - If Aguero was not playing, Pellers would be sacked.

Para 2. The phrases "Had Aguero not struck..." & "Pellegrini’s position as manager might have become untenable". Why are they consistently writing negative hypotheticals?

Para 3.

But for Aguero’s hat-trick against Bayern, City would not have qualified from their group

Again another negative hypothesis, this time double whammied by being totally inaccurate.

Para 3.

The name of Atletico Madrid’s manager, Diego Simeone, is being increasingly mentioned around the Etihad.

- By whom exactly?

Not one mention of the substitutions made by the manager which led to Jovetic setting up the two goals.

Once again, we're subjected to more conjectural, negative bullshit.

He only wrote 2 (two) lines and you couldn't be arsed reading the second one before wading in, well done.

 

[mad4city]

Here's the SS contemptible hack crew with another despicable attack on City this morning. Total disrespect for us contrasts with their earlier consensus that the Swamp dwellers were now heading for a top three finish or higher - quite shocking really, who else do we have to beat to a fair crack

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgtxSPgulhM&feature=youtu.be[/video]

Well, that sorts that. Aguero out, Bony in.
If only we had three or four players who look like they're City through and through; instead of mercenaries like Kompany, Zabaletta, Hart and oh, Agueroooo.

 

[Blue Punter]

I thought they were spot on in that article ^^ ????

What did you believe to be spot on?

Here's my take on the article.

Headline - If Aguero was not playing, Pellers would be sacked.

Para 2. The phrases "Had Aguero not struck..." & "Pellegrini’s position as manager might have become untenable". Why are they consistently writing negative hypotheticals?

Para 3.

But for Aguero’s hat-trick against Bayern, City would not have qualified from their group

Again another negative hypothesis, this time double whammied by being totally inaccurate.

Para 3.

The name of Atletico Madrid’s manager, Diego Simeone, is being increasingly mentioned around the Etihad.

- By whom exactly?

Not one mention of the substitutions made by the manager which led to Jovetic setting up the two goals.

Once again, we're subjected to more conjectural, negative bullshit.

He only wrote 2 (two) lines and you couldn't be arsed reading the second one before wading in, well done.

Who only wrote 2 (two) lines?