The British Monarchy

Phil1 said:
Approval rating? What the fuckity fuck does that even mean? Did you get asked? I didn’t.
What do you mean, who am I? What the fuck has that got to do with you?

You might know me as Pablo.. :-)
Click to expand...

oh so you have had to rejoin! Or rename your self. Great stuff. Thanks for answering my question.

I know you live an express link so here goes

www.express.co.uk

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's popularity takes a plunge

PRINCE HARRY'S popularity has seen a drastic decrease in recent YouGov polls despite embarking on several engagements in New York.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
 
worsleyweb said:
oh so you have had to rejoin! Or rename your self. Great stuff. Thanks for answering my question.
Click to expand...
Nope, decided in honour of Phil being the greatest player who will ever don the shirt it was time to pay homage by changing my username for a bit.
I’ll go back one day. Unlike you, being the absolute **** you are I don’t keep getting banned.
 
Phil1 said:
Nope, decided in honour of Phil being the greatest player who will ever don the shirt it was time to pay homage by changing my username for a bit.
I’ll go back one day. Unlike you, being the absolute **** you are I don’t keep getting banned.
Click to expand...

Phil - you seem very angry. I have not been banned for about 4 years? I preferred Pablo.

absilute **** for saying not many like Harry and kowalski talks shit and I hope the queen is ok? Ok then.
 
worsleyweb said:
Phil - you seem very angry. I have not been banned for about 4 years? I preferred Pablo.

absilute **** for saying not many like Harry and kowalski talks shit and I hope the queen is ok? Ok then.
Click to expand...
I’m as happy as Harry and Meg are right now. Life is good.
 
worsleyweb said:
26 percent approval rating. Who are you by the way?
Click to expand...

A deeper dive into the 3rd Sept poll...back to my initial point about relevance with younger generations and reflecting modern Britain. Given the universal hate campaign in the press, these are good numbers.

’Age is a dividing factor when it comes to Harry and Meghan, who prove most popular among the young. Those aged between 18 and 24 are split over Harry (47% positive vs 44% negative) and tend to think positively of Meghan (50% vs 40%). By contrast, only 13-18% of people aged 65 and over think of Harry and Meghan positively.‘
 
BobKowalski said:
A deeper dive into the 3rd Sept poll...back to my initial point about relevance with younger generations and reflecting modern Britain. Given the universal hate campaign in the press, these are good numbers.

’Age is a dividing factor when it comes to Harry and Meghan, who prove most popular among the young. Those aged between 18 and 24 are split over Harry (47% positive vs 44% negative) and tend to think positively of Meghan (50% vs 40%). By contrast, only 13-18% of people aged 65 and over think of Harry and Meghan positively.‘
Click to expand...

Youth is wasted on the young springs to mind. What’s your excuse you are not a child?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
worsleyweb said:
you are the one who suggested Harry be king? Not me?
Click to expand...

Oh, dear. I assume you’ve now forgotten who said what. Probably age. Maybe get it checked out?

Anyway, to recap. I punted the idea of Harry based on generational appeal, relatability, reflecting modern Britain etc. It isn’t going to happen, but what the hell.

Your response was to smear poo on the wall. Again, this may be related to the whole ‘forgetting’ thing. I don’t know. I’m not a doctor.
 
BobKowalski said:
Oh, dear. I assume you’ve now forgotten who said what. Probably age. Maybe get it checked out?

Anyway, to recap. I punted the idea of Harry based on generational appeal, relatability, reflecting modern Britain etc. It isn’t going to happen, but what the hell.

Your response was to smear poo on the wall. Again, this may be related to the whole ‘forgetting’ thing. I don’t know. I’m not a doctor.
Click to expand...
If the next king were to reflect today’s England, we’d probably end up with Neil Warnock or ‘Arry Redknapp.
 
BobKowalski said:
Oh, dear. I assume you’ve now forgotten who said what. Probably age. Maybe get it checked out?

Anyway, to recap. I punted the idea of Harry based on generational appeal, relatability, reflecting modern Britain etc. It isn’t going to happen, but what the hell.

Your response was to smear poo on the wall. Again, this may be related to the whole ‘forgetting’ thing. I don’t know. I’m not a doctor.
Click to expand...

lot of waffle to say you posted some bullshit
 
west didsblue said:
If the next king were to reflect today’s England, we’d probably end up with Neil Warnock or ‘Arry Redknapp.
Click to expand...

Nah, we’ll do what we normally do when we run out of suitable royals. Ship one in from overseas. I’d go for Italian. Look good, hair doesn’t fall out, smart dressers.
 
BobKowalski said:
Maybe, except I would probably vote to retain the institution. Not through any love or interest in the Royal Family, but because I wouldn’t trust this country to put anything remotely credible inits place.

As a functioning State we would be hard pushed to tie our own shoelaces.

That said, I don’t see the Royal Family lasting much beyond Liz. William is probably the safe option. Harry and Megan to inject a bit of life into it would get my vote.
Click to expand...


Charles is a turn off

William a dullard and pointless

Harry and megan would never be accepted by the establishmemt or most of the geneal lemmings(sorry public) who have had several years conditioning to dislike them.

Best thing to do it bin ot off once lizzy carks it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top