Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2009
- Messages
- 16,617
Sorry I read your statement as implying they were reducing CO2. They certainly are not.That isn’t inconsistent with what I posted.
Sorry I read your statement as implying they were reducing CO2. They certainly are not.That isn’t inconsistent with what I posted.
No, but they are purposefully moving towards that based on what I’ve read, whereas India is not. I do realise what I posted appeared somewhat paradoxical!Sorry I read your statement as implying they were reducing CO2. They certainly are not.
It's completely futile nailing the UK and the EU economy to the green mast while the Chinese and Indians are still rapidly expanding coal fired electricity production. We are just pissing in the sea trying to affect global change.
Increased levels of CO2 emissions every year, is moving away i would say.No, but they are purposefully moving towards that based on what I’ve read, whereas India is not. I do realise what I posted appeared somewhat paradoxical!
Lol, you do realise we all live on one planet. You are clearly not a scientist, but appear to like taking the moral high ground. Happy to leave you to it. IgnoreYou do what you can. It doesn't matter what others are doing so your statement is an immature way of thinking.
I think that’s fair, and I probably framed it clumsily - my point is that based on what I’ve read they have a plan and purpose in relation to renewables which India and African nations do not and that the long term trajectory is towards renewables in China.Increased levels of CO2 emissions every year, is moving away i would say.
Right, yeah.
Why would anyone be interested in Starmer breaking the law himself, and knowing that he had done so, when he later said that you can’t be a lawmaker and a lawbreaker, and when he also promised that he would step down if had broken the law?
Too late by then, infact its too late now, they are increasing emissions and putting their short and medium GDP ahead of reducing climate change. My wider point is, their is no point in the UK or any other nation shacking ourselves to a green revolution, potentially reducing our economy and manufacturing when all we are doing is then buying the same goods made in a country on that has little or no env control is increasing emissions and then ships the goods from the other side of the world. Unless we do something about that imbalance we are effectively making things worse. I see no sign of the EU or UK doing anything about this.I think that’s fair, and I probably framed it clumsily - my point is that based on what I’ve read they have a plan and purpose in relation to renewables which India and African nations do not and that the long term trajectory is towards renewables in China.
So do you genuinely think every country should just burn as many fossil fuels as they can dig up?Too late by then, infact its too late now, they are increasing emissions and putting their short and medium GDP ahead of reducing climate change. My wider point is, their is no point in the UK or any other nation shacking ourselves to a green revolution, potentially reducing our economy and manufacturing when all we are doing is then buying the same goods made in a country on that has little or no env control is increasing emissions and then ships the goods from the other side of the world. Unless we do something about that imbalance we are effectively making things worse. I see no sign of the UK or the EU doing anything about this sadly.
Imports from China to the UK have gone up as our emissions have gone down and there's have gone up and continue to do so.
....but at any cost? especially to the "hard working" public. We needto see some true leadership here.You do what you can. It doesn't matter what others are doing so your statement is an immature way of thinking.
Too late by then, infact its too late now, they are increasing emissions and putting their short and medium GDP ahead of reducing climate change. My wider point is, their is no point in the UK or any other nation shacking ourselves to a green revolution, potentially reducing our economy and manufacturing when all we are doing is then buying the same goods made in a country on that has little or no env control is increasing emissions and then ships the goods from the other side of the world. Unless we do something about that imbalance we are effectively making things worse. I see no sign ofI think that’s fair, and I probably framed it clumsily - my point is that based on what I’ve read they have a plan and purpose in relation to renewables which India and African nations do not and that the long term trajectory is towards renewables in China.
Read my last post. Any UK green policy has to be part of a wider strategy. Involving controls and possibly tariffs on country's that are not reducing their emissions.So do you genuinely think every country should just burn as many fossil fuels as they can dig up?
Silly statement, they shouldn't but it seems crazy that we in the (supposedly world-leading) UK should be taxing our own people to death and exporting jobs to fund change and 'green' projects while other MUCH bigger contributors to the problem carry on regardless don't you think?So do you genuinely think every country should just burn as many fossil fuels as they can dig up?
Increased levels of CO2 emissions every year, is moving away i would say.
Pls read all of my posts on this before jumping to conclusions.Quite a few experts have argued that China's emissions have peaked, or will do soon.
This link suggests they've already flattened out.
The argument that we shouldn't if they aren't I don't buy anyway. If we followed that, we'd rarely do anything positive, and enough countries seem to agree for it to at least be making some difference. Given that in a city like Manchester, net zero will also improve the health of our kids as they grow up, then I've got to disagree that we'll be left behind.
.... not to forget the huge amount of pollutant we are adding to the worlds problem through the importing of all this cheap quality steel from India. Never mind, don't worry when we get a supportive Labour Government in power..... ahhhh... we have had one of those in Wales for over a quarter of a century, for a long time underpinned by a Labour Government in Westminster...Silly statement, they shouldn't but it seems crazy that we in the (supposedly world-leading) UK should be taxing our own people to death and exporting jobs to fund change and 'green' projects while other MUCH bigger contributors to the problem carry on regardless don't you think?
If we want to tackle climate change then we have to do it as a whole. UK might be seen to be spearheading change, but unless the rest of the world follows, we are pissing in the wind.Too late by then, infact its too late now, they are increasing emissions and putting their short and medium GDP ahead of reducing climate change. My wider point is, their is no point in the UK or any other nation shacking ourselves to a green revolution, potentially reducing our economy and manufacturing when all we are doing is then buying the same goods made in a country on that has little or no env control is increasing emissions and then ships the goods from the other side of the world. Unless we do something about that imbalance we are effectively making things worse. I see no sign of
Imports from China to the UK have gone up as our emissions have gone down and there's have gone up and continue to do so.
Read my last post. Any UK green policy has to be part of a wider strategy. Involving controls and possibly tariffs on country's that are not reducing their emissions.
Pls read all of my posts on this before jumping to conclusions.
I already had :)
The broader argument, seemed to be a bit of lipstick on top of the, "they're not doing it, so we can't", hence my reply (which also pointed out that in terms of China, it appears "they" are doing it).
Wrong, I am a scientistLol, you do realise we all live on one planet. You are clearly not a scientist, but appear to like taking the moral high ground. Happy to leave you to it. Ignore