Judicial Review. Ombudsman.Frankly, like the public sector, PGMOL enjoy the luxury that there is no effective sanction against poor performance . People who are crap or worse, clearly biased, should be fired, starting with Darren England.
Not walk outs but sit it's after the final whistle.
Easier to organise, no in- match disruption.
Select two dates so that everyone gets a home game & away game.
Publicise the bollocks off the dates for max national & International media exposure.
Get the BLACK FLAGS out..but remember this is against all the authorities AND the complicit rags !!
I understand that the "clear and obvious" element was included in the VAR implementation rules/criteria as a means to pacify elements of fans who were against the introduction of VAR on the basis that it would prolong and/or interrupt the flow of games were it to be used for every potential error, and again I believe this was widely accepted as a good call initially.
The issue now is that this watering down is seemingly being used to justify calls which benefit certain clubs on a pretty regular basis, which is wrong whatever the underlying cause/reason.
Those who call for VAR to be dropped on the basis that we should just go back to the on field ref are delusional if they think that that would change anything. Have they so soon forgotten the horrendous decisions made in just the same way and on an even more regular basis than since VAR was introduced?
I’m the opposite because no way would a ref who has a get out of “I didn’t see it” ever give that.
So it’s simple VAR can’t make mistakes. They’ve lied by saying it wasn’t clear & obvious when it was. Just apply the law & the cover up needs investigating by the premier league. Surely the members don’t just complain about City, surely they say it is important to re-referee when refs are shit scared of giving decisions at OT or Anfield against them.
He was being subjectivenothing wrong with being pedantic if you're also correct :)
In the NFL, a coaches challenge system operates, in which a Head Coach may instigate a video review of play after any down, by throwing a red flag onto the field.Perhaps they should do a review system like Cricket and Tennis,the captains have say 3 reviews per game.
If the captain thinks that the ref should go to the VAR screen (only circumstances that are are deemed worthy) then wouldn't this be a fair alternative?
What company is going to take that job then? "Come and regulate our game and if you make a mistake, we'll fine you millions." Yeah, no thanks.Var is a brilliant tool if used correctly, the main difference is a ref can always see something or not see it, VAR can not, we all have 4k and recordings so we can see VAR cheating on a weekly basis. time to sack the officials using VAR and bring in an independent company , a lot of people believe this new company would be just as corrupt, but not if after the match a club could challenge the incidents, leading to reparation, and the most serious costing European spots or relegation, the full cost of missing out all charged to the independent company.
VAR is a review system. And it still gets it wrong. Why would it be any different if the manager instigated the review? It'd just be the same "yeah, we've checked and it's not a penalty."Perhaps they should do a review system like Cricket and Tennis,the captains have say 3 reviews per game.
If the captain thinks that the ref should go to the VAR screen (only circumstances that are are deemed worthy) then wouldn't this be a fair alternative?