Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,373
Sorry but I'm sick of the bullshit from people trying to remove any nuance because they are upset. I agree it's a bit of a stretch to assume City played the cartel to weed out the snakes(would have been better to say no and let them just go ahead with it). However other people are just as bad with the theory that City colluded with the cartel from the begining because that goes against the timeline of info we were given by the media(who have no love for City).
Setting the thing up, pitching it to your fellow cartel members and then fear mongering the few big clubs(none cartel) who were not part of the negotiations, contract drafting, setup process... into joining at short notice. That's all a damn site worse than being one of those few clubs who joined late out of fear of being left behind by something they were told they couldn't stop. You'd have to be blind not to see the difference.
I suppose, it's not confirmed but there are reports that City didn't have long to decide and were still unsure about it as it was announced, hence City not being part of the initial list of clubs, with some journalists saying City are the only club not to be involved. The balanced outlook isn't deciding how you want to feel about this, cherry picking which reports you want to remember or not and then coming to your conclusion. You take all sides of it and try and deduce the most likely events that took place and the reasons for them.
As for punishments, come back down to earth, just because you're upset it doesn't mean crime has taken place or rules have been broken. These cartel members spent years on this and will have hired lawyers to cover all aspects of it. What has happened is people have a lot of bad will towards these clubs because trust has been broken with the rest of football, which includes their own fans and possibly their sponsors.
Setting the thing up, pitching it to your fellow cartel members and then fear mongering the few big clubs(none cartel) who were not part of the negotiations, contract drafting, setup process... into joining at short notice. That's all a damn site worse than being one of those few clubs who joined late out of fear of being left behind by something they were told they couldn't stop. You'd have to be blind not to see the difference.
I suppose, it's not confirmed but there are reports that City didn't have long to decide and were still unsure about it as it was announced, hence City not being part of the initial list of clubs, with some journalists saying City are the only club not to be involved. The balanced outlook isn't deciding how you want to feel about this, cherry picking which reports you want to remember or not and then coming to your conclusion. You take all sides of it and try and deduce the most likely events that took place and the reasons for them.
As for punishments, come back down to earth, just because you're upset it doesn't mean crime has taken place or rules have been broken. These cartel members spent years on this and will have hired lawyers to cover all aspects of it. What has happened is people have a lot of bad will towards these clubs because trust has been broken with the rest of football, which includes their own fans and possibly their sponsors.
Last edited: