Len Rum
Well-Known Member
I'm not saying we played well, I'm saying that based on their handball goal we should have won 1-0 and based on the number and quality of chances we were better than Wolves and could have won two or three nil.But we don't get extra points for hitting the bar do we, one a worldy from Raheem.
If people want to split hairs, Ederson makes a save into the side netting when the lad is four yards out.
Wolves have a goal correctly ruled for offside when Vinny has another brain fart.
And if it wasn't for Vinny in the dying minutes, the lad at the back post has a simple tap in.
Our team was strung out from back to front far too many times resembling Pep's first season.
Gundogan isn't good enough for what we need him to play, nowhere near, but that's just my own personal view.
West Ham should have been four up yesterday at Arsenal before they imploded.
All teams can point to their own chances, but we gave Wolves far too many looks yesterday when the ball broke down as we reached the final third.
The same looks which sees better teams such as Liverpool make the most of three looks in transition against us before half time?
I accept that being "better than Wolves" is way below the standards we should be aiming for but that's not the point here, we were good enough to beat them (which is where I disagreed with the previous poster). We didn't because of the circumstances I've just outlined.