Grealish has shown ambition , Kane wouldn't know ambition if he tried .Don't agree with that.
Kane wanted to go yes.
We didn't want any City players in exchange, just the cash.
He may be unhappy now but he's professional and will get over it. No doubt he will have another great season, his consistency is there for all to see.
He will still be worth around 100 million next summer.
I will say from the outside, I don't understand why you didn't throw the kitchen sink at Spurs for Kane, and leave Grealish. You are stacked in those positions, Grealish is a quality player but he isn't in Kane's class either goals wise or assist wise. I was saying this before today on here as well so I'm not here to rub it in or anything. Maybe Grealish has more marketing appeal or something, but for footballing reasons it doesn't make sense. Grealish will probably have a decent season, maybe even a very good one, but he won't surpass Kane output wise and creating isn't your problem, it's more finishing.
Also the difference is Grealish has a competent agentGrealish has shown ambition , Kane wouldn't know ambition if he tried .
that mindset doesn't work here .
I think you make a valid point on Grealish - but what constitutes the kitchen sink - £150m? I just don’t think he’s worth that.Don't agree with that.
Kane wanted to go yes.
We didn't want any City players in exchange, just the cash.
He may be unhappy now but he's professional and will get over it. No doubt he will have another great season, his consistency is there for all to see.
He will still be worth around 100 million next summer.
I will say from the outside, I don't understand why you didn't throw the kitchen sink at Spurs for Kane, and leave Grealish. You are stacked in those positions, Grealish is a quality player but he isn't in Kane's class either goals wise or assist wise. I was saying this before today on here as well so I'm not here to rub it in or anything. Maybe Grealish has more marketing appeal or something, but for footballing reasons it doesn't make sense. Grealish will probably have a decent season, maybe even a very good one, but he won't surpass Kane output wise and creating isn't your problem, it's more finishing.
Banned for not following your little set view? What world do you live in lol!?!...people like you are why extinction rebellion is an actual thing.I can't believe you're still here.
Surely you should've been banned for your moronic posts.
BUT you are providing us blues with comedy moments like the one above.
What the funk are you babbling on about?Banned for not following your little set view? What world do you live in lol!?!...people like you are why extinction rebellion is an actual thing.
You see that ignore button!?!...its probably your best best if you dont like your narrative being challenged. Consider it your safe space.
The brothers dim.Kane is too stupid and his brother worse.
The brothers Grim
Grealish is 2 years and 2 months younger than Kane.Grealish is 4 years younger than Kane. But more importantly Pep likes attacking mids more than Strikers they are more important to him, It works for him, hence why we won the league last season without a striker up front. We would have liked Kane but not at any cost. Kane may win the golden boot this season but odds on it will be Grealish picking up winners medals in the next few seasons.
Would we all leave City if we played for them? Would we jump ship to spurs to win trophies or would you stay to try to help?The brothers dim.
Same amount of shots on target tooThe Menendez brothers>The Kane brothers
The shit is being talked by you alone. You just attacked without even quoting a specific thing i wrote for christs sake. You also evidently cannot read simple stuff.What the funk are you babbling on about?
I just think you talk shit. In a nutshell.
Missed it all driving in Wales but the outcome of no Kane isn't dis-pleasurable.Whats the butchers bill so far today mods? Thread bans, full bans?