PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

TheThirdDeano said:
As a side note they’re probably putting sugar in the crust or sauce. Makes sense as Sugar is addictive so they’re probably hoping for customer retention!
Did you know the El Paso taco spice mix is 30g but contains 10g of sugar? Sugar is evil, insidious and everywhere.
Kind of like the fingerprints of Americans and the terrible things happening to the premier league Recently!
Click to expand...
Definitely in the sauce, check the back of 99% of tomato-based sauces in the supermarket they have a good heap of sugar. Then consumers add more of their own when cooking, so, I guess it's warranted.

Subway's bread could not be classified as "bread" under Irish tax laws, due to the high sugar content. It actually qualified as a type of cake.

I'll take sugar over high-fructose corn syrup any day though. A huge contributor towards the dietary problems across the pond is the fact that companies either substituted, or in some cases supplemented, sugar with HFCS in just about everything there, and it's terrible for you.

We digress
 
Bez said:
The absurd thing with this is the PL are getting rid of the rules they have used to sanction Everton and Forest for a new set of rules. From uncharted waters to uncharted waters. How do they know the new rules will work better? They are hoping they are better, but only time will tell. Sheer lunacy. PL leadership not fit to run football. Total idiots. End of rant.
Click to expand...
The switching of rules almost makes me think that a certain club might well be sailing very close to the wind under the current rules.

I know they say it's too align with uefa, but you can bet your last pound it will help out at least one of the cartel along the way.
 
COAT_OF_ARMS said:
Definitely in the sauce, check the back of 99% of tomato-based sauces in the supermarket they have a good heap of sugar. Then consumers add more of their own when cooking, so, I guess it's warranted.

Subway's bread could not be classified as "bread" under Irish tax laws, due to the high sugar content. It actually qualified as a type of cake.

I'll take sugar over high-fructose corn syrup any day though. A huge contributor towards the dietary problems across the pond is the fact that companies either substituted, or in some cases supplemented, sugar with HFCS in just about everything there, and it's terrible for you.

We digress
Click to expand...

Didn’t know about subway bread, that’s fascinating!

The older I get the more I’m trying to make my own things to control what’s inside. Sadly I don’t have enough time to do everything, but we’ll get there.

It amazing you know, the taste difference, HFCS takes like sick imo! Can’t believe they think it’s better. Probably a cost thing? Classic Americans, it always come down to
 
TheThirdDeano said:
Didn’t know about subway bread, that’s fascinating!

The older I get the more I’m trying to make my own things to control what’s inside. Sadly I don’t have enough time to do everything, but we’ll get there.

It amazing you know, the taste difference, HFCS takes like sick imo! Can’t believe they think it’s better. Probably a cost thing? Classic Americans, it always come down to
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, it's cost.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The whole thing is turning from a shambles to a complete fucking shambles.
Click to expand...
Completely the fault of City that these rules have had to be tweaked chronically.

If we had taken our medicine instead of demonstrating that quality throughout the management will eventually allow our total success this would not have happened.

In short we are responsible for the shambles being needed as you say to the nth degree.
 
Football fans need to coordinate and mobilise against this omnishambolic, protectionist cartel.
I'm no Bob Geldof, but clever outrage on social media needs backing up.
Every week there are demonstrations about something, but us football fans, sit behind our pc devices moaning and hoping.
 
paulchapo said:
That's why I've got zero sympathy for any of them. "What about City???" The sheep bleat. Never mind City.....what about fucking YOU!!!
Click to expand...
When people say "what about City?!!!", what they are really saying is "I have shit for brains and I never do any of my own research, I am a clueless lemming and I believe everything I read/hear after it is repeated at least twice on twitter or talkshite".
 
Bez said:
When people say "what about City?!!!", what they are really saying is "I have shit for brains and I never do any of my own research, I am a clueless lemming and I believe everything I read after it is repeated at least twice on twitter or talkshite".
Click to expand...

‘What about City’ should be registered at companies house. Would look fantastic on the double advertising boards round the pitch, could bang some more transfer funds through it just to piss them off even more.
 
give it to gordon said:
The pl is in a real mess letting the red tops +1 run the pl
Click to expand...
Seriously, I think Sky has been very hands on, and influential, over the Premier League’s decisions over the last decade.

Sky stole football from the league, greasing many hands so they could create the Premier League. They then proceeded to build their whole sports package around the red three, plus Everton and Spurs (the original big 5).

When Chelsea broke the power base through unprecedented financial investment, Sky were the first to drive the narrative to discredit any Chelsea success. Until they realised that it wasn’t affecting the 3 red teams that much, they were happy to let Everton and Spurs slip back as the subscriptions kept increasing, and Sky was becoming more accessible around the world.

2008 the laughing stock of English football, a once giant of the game, a bankrupt club in the making Manchester City FC, would shock the football world with the takeover by Sheikh Mansour and the signing of Robinho.

From that moment in 2008, City faced discrimination, lies, and collusion involving some of the most powerful people/organisations in football, and media, driven through greed and fear, they set their plans to stop another Chelsea type project.
 
Mid Wales blue said:
Seriously, I think Sky has been very hands on, and influential, over the Premier League’s decisions over the last decade.

Sky stole football from the league, greasing many hands so they could create the Premier League. They then proceeded to build their whole sports package around the red three, plus Everton and Spurs (the original big 5).

When Chelsea broke the power base through unprecedented financial investment, Sky were the first to drive the narrative to discredit any Chelsea success. Until they realised that it wasn’t affecting the 3 red teams that much, they were happy to let Everton and Spurs slip back as the subscriptions kept increasing, and Sky was becoming more accessible around the world.

2008 the laughing stock of English football, a once giant of the game, a bankrupt club in the making Manchester City FC, would shock the football world with the takeover by Sheikh Mansour and the signing of Robinho.

From that moment in 2008, City faced discrimination, lies, and collusion involving some of the most powerful people/organisations in football, and media, driven through greed and fear, they set their plans to stop another Chelsea type project.
Click to expand...

BSkyB had a stake in the rags which they sold to JP Mcmanus and John Magnier back in 2003 for £63 million. Talk about having a vested interest in stake holders within their product, Murdoch even had a go at buying them at one point.

They have been at the forefront of creating the divide for the red teams throughout the entirety of the premier league. No wonder they shit their pants when the super league was coming down the tracks.
 
Bez said:
When people say "what about City?!!!", what they are really saying is "I have shit for brains and I never do any of my own research, I am a clueless lemming and I believe everything I read/hear after it is repeated at least twice on twitter or talkshite".
Click to expand...
Just shown a clip on BBC Breakfast of Forest fans doing just that. I just ignore it now, you can’t teach the stupid.
 
GaudinoMotors said:
Football fans need to coordinate and mobilise against this omnishambolic, protectionist cartel.
I'm no Bob Geldof, but clever outrage on social media needs backing up.
Every week there are demonstrations about something, but us football fans, sit behind our pc devices moaning and hoping.
Click to expand...
This should involve the National Football Fans Association .

When was the last (or first) time they were involved in any meaningful matter ??

They should be explaining (simply),to supporters clubs and fans generally, the background,source,implications and solutions to relevant matters. If they can’t they shouldn’t be in ‘office’

Additionally, the NFSA should then be mobilising enlightened fans to take direct action against any offending body who are ruining and stealing the game from ‘the most important’ investors.....the fans !!

City are repetitively painted as the cause of most problems since the investment by HH Sheikh Mansour when the reality is totally different. It is this total misrepresentation that influences the thinking/responses of other fans ....a viscous circle of mis truths and negativity.

One day (not too soon) City may be thanked for their insights, actions and solutions that will change the face of football administration and management.

Manchester thanks you Sheikh Mansour.

DELICIOUS !!
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
BSkyB had a stake in the rags which they sold to JP Mcmanus and John Magnier back in 2003 for £63 million. Talk about having a vested interest in stake holders within their product, Murdoch even had a go at buying them at one point.

They have been at the forefront of creating the divide for the red teams throughout the entirety of the premier league. No wonder they shit their pants when the super league was coming down the tracks.
Click to expand...

They had a stake in us to
 
FanchesterCity said:
Tony Bellew on talksport moaning that it's becoming a closed shop. Donkeys years too late. We told you all this was the case and you didn't listen.

He's doing the whataboutcity now. It's so ignorant. One minute bemoaning that you can't invest and then moaning at city because they did invest.
Click to expand...
1894 should create a huge banner to display at home and all away grounds.
WE WARNED YOU.
YOU DIDN'T LISTEN.
 
Gone for a Burton said:
This should involve the National Football Fans Association .

When was the last (or first) time they were involved in any meaningful matter ??

They should be explaining (simply),to supporters clubs and fans generally, the background,source,implications and solutions to relevant matters. If they can’t they shouldn’t be in ‘office’

Additionally, the NFSA should then be mobilising enlightened fans to take direct action against any offending body who are ruining and stealing the game from ‘the most important’ investors.....the fans !!

City are repetitively painted as the cause of most problems since the investment by HH Sheikh Mansour when the reality is totally different. It is this total misrepresentation that influences the thinking/responses of other fans ....a viscous circle of mis truths and negativity.

One day (not too soon) City may be thanked for their insights, actions and solutions that will change the face of football administration and management.

Manchester thanks you Sheikh Mansour.

DELICIOUS !!
Click to expand...
Had quick look at this organisation- looks the usual toothless, cap doffing, placatory, running alongside and not creating too many waves accessory.
Weasel words regurgitation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top