Devolution For The Regions - Gtr Manchester

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrb
  • Start date Start date
No Raynor never had a job in the real
World too. I have just seen a picture of Jess Phillips. You couldn’t make this up. She looks like a character from little Britain.

We are truly and utterly fucked.

Don’t fare what you say if these people came for a job with me I would laugh. They are ruining our country. It’s terrifying. We are absolutely fucked trust me.
What’s a real world job? Brick counting or being a landlord I would guess.
Don’t think you need to worry about them asking you for a job in your real world.
 
What’s a real world job? Brick counting or being a landlord I would guess.
Don’t think you need to worry about them asking you for a job in your real world.

Brick counting lol! I don’t need a job.

Phillips, Raynor and Lammy!

Beyond belief. You have faith in these people!
 
So people that work in care homes don't have jobs in the real world?

That's a disgusting attitude towards working class women doing hard graft that's also emotionally demanding for very little money, if that's what you believe.

You think they have the business experience to be running a country?
 
You think they have the business experience to be running a country?

They aren't running a business. Running a business and running a government are two different things.

You understand the point that people who have successfully run a business in one sector wouldn't necessarily be successful or even mediocre in another sector. There's successful business men who have ended up complete failures in the same sector because they were reliant on one model and lacked the flexibility.

Do you believe Simon Jordan, Alan Sugar or Peter Swales would have made good politicians?

Is it possible that people who have experience of working in a union, local government, representing constituents and serving in the shadow cabinet have better understanding of the mechanisms of government and are better qualified to work in government than a quantity surveyor and landlord?
 
Be careful what you wish for, remember Burnham thought a lower emissions charge for greater Manchester was a good idea. When it would just be a further tax on numerous small struggling businesses.

I'm still waiting for the grifter to solve the homeless crisis in Manchester, there are more and more beggars on the street and Piccadilly gardens resembles an open air mental ward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT
That's Burnhams job you idiot, do you deliver your own milk Dibley?
Yet you criticise him, without a clue how to solve it. It’s the same, whomever is in charge as you hate everything about the modern world.

Even if Farage got in, you’d hate him within days as he’s not made the world like you want it.
 
What's your solution?

Get a mayor in who can deliver what they promised? It's a shithole you and Dibley would do well to get yourself a des res there and become better acquainted.

The Mayor of Manchester and anyone linked with Manchester should be ashamed of that cess pit and ashamed of the apologists who forgive the grifter for allowing it.
 
Get a mayor in who can deliver what they promised? It's a shithole you and Dibley would do well to get yourself a des res there and become better acquainted.

The Mayor of Manchester and anyone linked with Manchester should be ashamed of that cess pit and ashamed of the apologists who forgive the grifter for allowing it.

Was it just me who automatically read this in the voice of Davros?

WWNFD? Hand out free pillow cases?

1720565659436.jpeg
 
They aren't running a business. Running a business and running a government are two different things.

You understand the point that people who have successfully run a business in one sector wouldn't necessarily be successful or even mediocre in another sector. There's successful business men who have ended up complete failures in the same sector because they were reliant on one model and lacked the flexibility.

Do you believe Simon Jordan, Alan Sugar or Peter Swales would have made good politicians?

Is it possible that people who have experience of working in a union, local government, representing constituents and serving in the shadow cabinet have better understanding of the mechanisms of government and are better qualified to work in government than a quantity surveyor and landlord?

You think you are being disparaging with you QS comment? So poor - they have inadequate inexperience simple as that. i help run a business with a quarter of a billion turnover so leave the QS snipes out please as you are a mile off - i haven't been a QS for 20 years and my properties i have trusted to my kids and have no involvement whatsoever in these days so again a mile off.
 
You think you are being disparaging with you QS comment? So poor - they have inadequate inexperience simple as that. i help run a business with a quarter of a billion turnover so leave the QS snipes out please as you are a mile off - i haven't been a QS for 20 years and my properties i have trusted to my kids and have no involvement whatsoever in these days so again a mile off.

It wasn't intended to be disparaging.It's reality.

It wouldn't matter if you were businessman who had sold his business for a quarter of a billion.

Those people are obviously more capable of working in government than yourself. If you genuinely believe different go and speak to the Conservatives or Reform UK or whichever party that will have you.

You don't have any experience of government.
 
Ah but this is the classic way of make sure no shit hits your fan. I remember Michael Howard when he was home secretary blaming the guy in charge of HM prisons and not accepting responsibility for overcrowding 'n rioting. I seem to recall a move to shift the interface the public had with HMG to 'agencies'. I remember getting a passport from the Passport Agency - they're back now as the Passport Office. I think we are gonna be in for as many spiffing wheezes from Sir Starmer as we had from Boris, Liz 'n Rishi! The latest to appear is the suggestion that the overcrowding in prisons is gonna be solved by letting some jailbirds out!
I don't think Starmer suggested letting people out. What he did suggest, was addressing issues early rather than letting the conveyor belt to prison go on and on. A young adult committing a knife crime will get sent down, but stopping such crimes at their source would be better. Rehabilitation before the offence, if you will. Many communities in this country are crying out for opportunity, if only as a distraction for young people sliding into crime.

Given Starmer's occupational history, I'd say he's much more clued up on this than you or I.
 
You think you are being disparaging with you QS comment? So poor - they have inadequate inexperience simple as that. i help run a business with a quarter of a billion turnover so leave the QS snipes out please as you are a mile off - i haven't been a QS for 20 years and my properties i have trusted to my kids and have no involvement whatsoever in these days so again a mile off.


Mr big time bragging again. I thought we’d got rid of BB2.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top