PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Cobwebcat]

 

[Goodlove]

"Let's launch"? That is the most feeble pretend ITK catchphrase I have EVER seen. Good god almighty, that is shite on a stick.

Worse than ‘There we land’?

 

[jimharri]

Let's launch? Please.

I'm going to start my own transfer news account, I think by catchphrase will be... Hmmm let me think.... Ok,how about "Get ready to rub that duck with some dry toast!"

It needs to be assessed while you're wearing red shoes, and dancing the blues.

 

[Bournemouth Blue]

City are the only victims of the delay in revealing the outcome. Guilty or not, we are seen as the guilty party by everyone who isn’t a City supporter, and as this drags on. If innocent they will accuse it as a whitewash, if found guilty, we will appeal and it will drag on for a few more years. I always used to thing football was a game.

 

[remember arthur mann]

City are the only victims of the delay in revealing the outcome. Guilty or not, we are seen as the guilty party by everyone who isn’t a City supporter, and as this drags on. If innocent they will accuse it as a whitewash, if found guilty, we will appeal and it will drag on for a few more years. I always used to thing football was a game.

Looks like full steam ahead for City. If we'd have been found guilty the PL would have been right into us to slam the brakes on our spending.

 

[chesterbells]

Looks like full steam ahead for City. If we'd have been found guilty the PL would have been right into us to slam the brakes on our spending.

Yeah, but maybe we’re going for all this quick spending now precisely cos we know there’s a likely transfer ban incoming? ;-)

 

[SilverFox2]

Yeah, but maybe we’re going for all this quick spending now precisely cos we know there’s a likely transfer ban incoming? ;-)

Either way we need to gamble with buying new players. Our previous stars simply did not perform so need replacements. The longer it goes on the less time we have to strengthen team and management.

It is probable there is no evidence so we are possibly found guilty by an improbable verdict arrived at by its legal term meaning balance of probability.

We are investing on our own balance of probabilities.

If wrong we appeal the verdict but at least team building has been done.
More than likely we will have won and our gamble to spend will be justified.
Just an opinion.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

If only the cabal and their lackies in the PL were able to understand the accuracy of this post.

 

[chesterbells]

Either way we need to gamble with buying new players. Our previous stars simply did not perform so need replacements. The longer it goes on the less time we have to strengthen team and management.

It is probable there is no evidence so we are possibly found guilty by an improbable verdict arrived at by its legal term meaning balance of probability.

We are investing on our own balance of probabilities.

If wrong we appeal the verdict but at least team building has been done.
More than likely we will have won and our gamble to spend will be justified.
Just an opinion.

Maybe, but it’s just as valid as any other bud.

 

[give it to gordon]

We have been saying for ages the pl is in self destruction mode.

 

[Bald fraud]

We have been saying for ages the pl is in self destruction mode.

Yep and all to get the rags back in top spot. Fuckin weird!

 

[Nightmare Walking]

If only the cabal and their lackies in the PL were able to understand the accuracy of this post.

Not sure that is true though, mate. PSG are liable to the same UEFA regulations as us. I may be wrong here and I apologise if I am. But, I thought FFP was stricter than PSR.
There was nothing stopping the big Prmier League clubs getting any of those players.
Vitinha was on loan at Wolves and hardly pulled up any trees.

 

[eastmanc]

Yeah, but maybe we’re going for all this quick spending now precisely cos we know there’s a likely transfer ban incoming? ;-)

Again, we need a rebuild.

 

[Giovinco]

This has all ramped up again because we’re active in the market. Same old crap.

 

[deano ou812]

Yeah, but maybe we’re going for all this quick spending now precisely cos we know there’s a likely transfer ban incoming? ;-)

Is that up to fifa to impose a transfer ban not in the premier leagues remit ..

 

[mike1923]

Does anyone else think that the Saudi league need reining in, in terms of the over-inflated prices that they are offering for players?
Yes, I know they have to pay more to attract anyone, but some of the values that they're offering for mediocre at best players stinks of money-laundering and is also a get-out-of-jail card for cash strapped clubs like united who can then use that money to rebuild a team.

I’m not sure you launder money by giving it to other clubs in other leagues, do you?

In order to launder it, they’d need to be finding a way to pay it to themselves, no?

 

[Lord Blue]

Either way we need to gamble with buying new players. Our previous stars simply did not perform so need replacements. The longer it goes on the less time we have to strengthen team and management.

It is probable there is no evidence so we are possibly found guilty by an improbable verdict arrived at by its legal term meaning balance of probability.

We are investing on our own balance of probabilities.

If wrong we appeal the verdict but at least team building has been done.
More than likely we will have won and our gamble to spend will be justified.
Just an opinion.

Not sure how they can find us guilty if, as you suggest, there is no evidence. Fairly sure that’s not how balance of probability works.
If they have no evidence then they have no case. Surely?

 

[SilverFox2]

Not sure how they can find us guilty if, as you suggest, there is no evidence. Fairly sure that’s not how balance of probability works.
If they have no evidence then they have no case. Surely?

Thought as you say evidence is proof of action whereas balance of probability is intention to do an action but no evidence you actually did.
Perhaps I misunderstood. I

 

[BringBackSwales]

Not sure that is true though, mate. PSG are liable to the same UEFA regulations as us. I may be wrong here and I apologise if I am. But, I thought FFP was stricter than PSR.
There was nothing stopping the big Prmier League clubs getting any of those players.
Vitinha was on loan at Wolves and hardly pulled up any trees.

No PSR is definitely much stricter than FFP

 

[dadnlad]

No PSR is definitely much stricter than FFP

Depending on club badge