Edin Dzeko

Status
Not open for further replies.
BosnianDragon said:
Señor Manuel said:
To be fair, Dzeko would take that Rag defence apart too.

Excactlly, Dzeko would be probably more leathal then Negredo. It is clear now that Dzeko has very strong oposition which is everywhere, in club, management, supporters etc. Therefore it would be the best for all that he leaves in January. He is too important for our national team and our small country so don't want City to destroy and waist his carrier.

Utter rubbish. Dzeko gets a fair crack in what is now very much a squad game, and if he's not an ever present then it's only because of his own shortcomings, such as having the first touch of a rhinoceros, particularly with his back to goal. He is well appreciated by the fans, who, barring one or two idiots, always get behind him and sing his name. He's playing for one of the best teams in the most competitive league in the world, alongside some fantastically talented players. How can that be bad for his career?!
 
Exeter Blue I am here said:
BosnianDragon said:
Señor Manuel said:
To be fair, Dzeko would take that Rag defence apart too.

Excactlly, Dzeko would be probably more leathal then Negredo. It is clear now that Dzeko has very strong oposition which is everywhere, in club, management, supporters etc. Therefore it would be the best for all that he leaves in January. He is too important for our national team and our small country so don't want City to destroy and waist his carrier.

Utter rubbish. Dzeko gets a fair crack in what is now very much a squad game, and if he's not an ever present then it's only because of his own shortcomings, such as having the first touch of a rhinoceros, particularly with his back to goal. He is well appreciated by the fans, who, barring one or two idiots, always get behind him and sing his name. He's playing for one of the best teams in the most competitive league in the world, alongside some fantastically talented players. How can that be bad for his career?!

You did not read my previous post (did you ever asked yourself why Ozil left Real, Ibrahimovic Barcelona, Balloteli/Tevez MC etc..). There are tallented players and teams all around the world. Some you can be part of some you can't, some you can play more some less.....

I've been following Dzeko for long time (since he was 19-20 y old). In my posts I'm just presenting facts and obvious conclusions. In last two years he was mainly last (4-th) choice. Without enough competative matches he started losing his skill, especially goal instict is slowly going down the drain and also not playing effecting his confidence and moral. You will not find a player thinking about his carrier who is ready to sit on the bench. Only reason they are on the bench is expectation that by time they will deserve place in starters. For Dzeko and City that time is long over. Dzeko gave City all he could (best striker last year, crutial goal for title win etc.) but it is not sufficient. Therefore he should move on, not to waste another year of 1/2 season. He has only 3-4 years left to play on high competative level.
 
BosnianDragon said:
Exeter Blue I am here said:
BosnianDragon said:
Excactlly, Dzeko would be probably more leathal then Negredo. It is clear now that Dzeko has very strong oposition which is everywhere, in club, management, supporters etc. Therefore it would be the best for all that he leaves in January. He is too important for our national team and our small country so don't want City to destroy and waist his carrier.

Utter rubbish. Dzeko gets a fair crack in what is now very much a squad game, and if he's not an ever present then it's only because of his own shortcomings, such as having the first touch of a rhinoceros, particularly with his back to goal. He is well appreciated by the fans, who, barring one or two idiots, always get behind him and sing his name. He's playing for one of the best teams in the most competitive league in the world, alongside some fantastically talented players. How can that be bad for his career?!

You did not read my previous post (did you ever asked yourself why Ozil left Real, Ibrahimovic Barcelona, Balloteli/Tevez MC etc..). There are tallented players and teams all around the world. Some you can be part of some you can't, some you can play more some less.....

I've been following Dzeko for long time (since he was 19-20 y old). In my posts I'm just presenting facts and obvious conclusions. In last two years he was mainly last (4-th) choice. Without enough competative matches he started losing his skill, especially goal instict is slowly going down the drain and also not playing effecting his confidence and moral. You will not find a player thinking about his carrier who is ready to sit on the bench. Only reason they are on the bench is expectation that by time they will deserve place in starters. For Dzeko and City that time is long over. Dzeko gave City all he could (best striker last year, crutial goal for title win etc.) but it is not sufficient. Therefore he should move on, not to waste another year of 1/2 season. He has only 3-4 years left to play on high competative level.

If this is your reaction & all you care about after a fantastic victory where both strikers were immense, it's you who are wasting time with City, not Dzeko.

What an utter pile of shite.
 
Neville Kneville said:
BosnianDragon said:
Exeter Blue I am here said:
Utter rubbish. Dzeko gets a fair crack in what is now very much a squad game, and if he's not an ever present then it's only because of his own shortcomings, such as having the first touch of a rhinoceros, particularly with his back to goal. He is well appreciated by the fans, who, barring one or two idiots, always get behind him and sing his name. He's playing for one of the best teams in the most competitive league in the world, alongside some fantastically talented players. How can that be bad for his career?!

You did not read my previous post (did you ever asked yourself why Ozil left Real, Ibrahimovic Barcelona, Balloteli/Tevez MC etc..). There are tallented players and teams all around the world. Some you can be part of some you can't, some you can play more some less.....

I've been following Dzeko for long time (since he was 19-20 y old). In my posts I'm just presenting facts and obvious conclusions. In last two years he was mainly last (4-th) choice. Without enough competative matches he started losing his skill, especially goal instict is slowly going down the drain and also not playing effecting his confidence and moral. You will not find a player thinking about his carrier who is ready to sit on the bench. Only reason they are on the bench is expectation that by time they will deserve place in starters. For Dzeko and City that time is long over. Dzeko gave City all he could (best striker last year, crutial goal for title win etc.) but it is not sufficient. Therefore he should move on, not to waste another year of 1/2 season. He has only 3-4 years left to play on high competative level.

If this is your reaction & all you care about after a fantastic victory where both strikers were immense, it's you who are wasting time with City, not Dzeko.

What an utter pile of shite.

This is not topic to discuss victory against MU (I left few posts there too). This is "Edin Dzeko" topic so chose correct topic to discuss fantastic victory.
 
BosnianDragon said:
Neville Kneville said:
BosnianDragon said:
You did not read my previous post (did you ever asked yourself why Ozil left Real, Ibrahimovic Barcelona, Balloteli/Tevez MC etc..). There are tallented players and teams all around the world. Some you can be part of some you can't, some you can play more some less.....

I've been following Dzeko for long time (since he was 19-20 y old). In my posts I'm just presenting facts and obvious conclusions. In last two years he was mainly last (4-th) choice. Without enough competative matches he started losing his skill, especially goal instict is slowly going down the drain and also not playing effecting his confidence and moral. You will not find a player thinking about his carrier who is ready to sit on the bench. Only reason they are on the bench is expectation that by time they will deserve place in starters. For Dzeko and City that time is long over. Dzeko gave City all he could (best striker last year, crutial goal for title win etc.) but it is not sufficient. Therefore he should move on, not to waste another year of 1/2 season. He has only 3-4 years left to play on high competative level.

If this is your reaction & all you care about after a fantastic victory where both strikers were immense, it's you who are wasting time with City, not Dzeko.

What an utter pile of shite.

This is not topic to discuss victory against MU (I left few posts there too). This is "Edin Dzeko" topic so chose correct topic to discuss fantastic victory.

You mean this one ?

BosnianDragon said:
To be honest, we were not realy that great, MU was just too weak.
If MU continue playing like this they might finish around 5-10 place on table.

Wheras if Dzeko had been playing, we would have been Brazil from 1970.

You're not a City fan.
 
Neville Kneville said:
BosnianDragon said:
Neville Kneville said:
If this is your reaction & all you care about after a fantastic victory where both strikers were immense, it's you who are wasting time with City, not Dzeko.

What an utter pile of shite.

This is not topic to discuss victory against MU (I left few posts there too). This is "Edin Dzeko" topic so chose correct topic to discuss fantastic victory.

You mean this one ?

BosnianDragon said:
To be honest, we were not realy that great, MU was just too weak.
If MU continue playing like this they might finish around 5-10 place on table.

Wheras if Dzeko had been playing, we would have been Brazil from 1970.

You're not a City fan.

I am City fan but in the same time I'm Bosnian too (which you are not). We don't have luxury to waste are talents since we are such small country. If you are City supporter than you should be honest towards Dzeko same as City. He deserved that for his effort and achivement. We all should agree that he should leave. By the way that is not the only post I left on "fantastic voctory" there is one importante one about staying on the ground which is essential for all teams and could be applicable to you as well (maybe I'm wrong, not sure).
 
BosnianDragon said:
Neville Kneville said:
BosnianDragon said:
This is not topic to discuss victory against MU (I left few posts there too). This is "Edin Dzeko" topic so chose correct topic to discuss fantastic victory.

You mean this one ?

BosnianDragon said:
To be honest, we were not realy that great, MU was just too weak.
If MU continue playing like this they might finish around 5-10 place on table.

Wheras if Dzeko had been playing, we would have been Brazil from 1970.

You're not a City fan.

I am City fan but in the same time I'm Bosnian too (which you are not). We don't have luxury to waste are talents since we are such small country. If you are City supporter than you should be honest towards Dzeko same as City. He deserved that for his effort and achivement. We all should agree that he should leave. By the way that is not the only post I left on "fantastic voctory" there is one importante one about staying on the ground which is essential for all teams and could be applicable to you as well (maybe I'm wrong, not sure).

"Neville Kneville" you do care about MC but you do not care about Edin Dzeko which I completely understand (just do not understand what are you doing on this topic).
 
BosnianDragon said:
"Neville Kneville" you do care about MC but you do not care about Edin Dzeko which I completely understand (just do not understand what are you doing on this topic).

Surely if everyone agreed with you, it would be a very boring thread?
It sounds like he cares about Edin, just doesn't see him with bosnian tinted glasses.
My opinion is that all the strikers will get a fair amount of time on the pitch, dependant on Manuel's tactics on the day.
 
ColinBell'snamesake said:
BosnianDragon said:
"Neville Kneville" you do care about MC but you do not care about Edin Dzeko which I completely understand (just do not understand what are you doing on this topic).

Surely if everyone agreed with you, it would be a very boring thread?
It sounds like he cares about Edin, just doesn't see him with bosnian tinted glasses.
My opinion is that all the strikers will get a fair amount of time on the pitch, dependant on Manuel's tactics on the day.

Respect your opinion, but, I think that will not work out for any side included (already had that set-up before). Therefore Dzeko should leave as someone who already spend/wasted more time on the bench than other two in last 2-3 seasons. Negredo and Aguero should stay. City should bring 1-2 perspective young strikers as subs that could later become starters and fill in the gaps in the case of injury.
There is no such a thing as "fair amount" since manager decides who plays based on what he thinks is best for the team, not based on fairnes. If answer is mainly negative throughout the season any already "formed" player should look for another club after contract is over or if club let him go under reasonable conditions during current contract.
 
BosnianDragon said:
ColinBell'snamesake said:
BosnianDragon said:
"Neville Kneville" you do care about MC but you do not care about Edin Dzeko which I completely understand (just do not understand what are you doing on this topic).

Surely if everyone agreed with you, it would be a very boring thread?
It sounds like he cares about Edin, just doesn't see him with bosnian tinted glasses.
My opinion is that all the strikers will get a fair amount of time on the pitch, dependant on Manuel's tactics on the day.

Respect your opinion, but, I think that will not work out for any side included (already had that set-up before). Therefore Dzeko should leave as someone who already spend/wasted more time on the bench than other two in last 2-3 seasons. Negredo and Aguero should stay. City should bring 1-2 perspective young strikers as subs that could later become starters and fill in the gaps in the case of injury.
There is no such a thing as "fair amount" since manager decides who plays based on what he thinks is best for the team, not based on fairnes. If answer is mainly negative throughout the season any already "formed" player should look for another club after contract is over or if club let him go under reasonable conditions during current contract.
You are reading well too much in to stuff we are only 5 games in to a season that could contain over 60 games
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
BosnianDragon said:
ColinBell'snamesake said:
Surely if everyone agreed with you, it would be a very boring thread?
It sounds like he cares about Edin, just doesn't see him with bosnian tinted glasses.
My opinion is that all the strikers will get a fair amount of time on the pitch, dependant on Manuel's tactics on the day.

Respect your opinion, but, I think that will not work out for any side included (already had that set-up before). Therefore Dzeko should leave as someone who already spend/wasted more time on the bench than other two in last 2-3 seasons. Negredo and Aguero should stay. City should bring 1-2 perspective young strikers as subs that could later become starters and fill in the gaps in the case of injury.
There is no such a thing as "fair amount" since manager decides who plays based on what he thinks is best for the team, not based on fairnes. If answer is mainly negative throughout the season any already "formed" player should look for another club after contract is over or if club let him go under reasonable conditions during current contract.
You are reading well too much in to stuff we are only 5 games in to a season that could contain over 60 games

You correct, too early in season but I don't think anything will change throughout rest of the season. January is coming close. He had a chance to leave in summer. I think he stayed for new manager, new perspective, new goals...This time they should let him know they do not count on him up to level sufficient for him, put reasonable price tag so he can find another club.
 
BosnianDragon said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
BosnianDragon said:
Respect your opinion, but, I think that will not work out for any side included (already had that set-up before). Therefore Dzeko should leave as someone who already spend/wasted more time on the bench than other two in last 2-3 seasons. Negredo and Aguero should stay. City should bring 1-2 perspective young strikers as subs that could later become starters and fill in the gaps in the case of injury.
There is no such a thing as "fair amount" since manager decides who plays based on what he thinks is best for the team, not based on fairnes. If answer is mainly negative throughout the season any already "formed" player should look for another club after contract is over or if club let him go under reasonable conditions during current contract.
You are reading well too much in to stuff we are only 5 games in to a season that could contain over 60 games

You correct, too early in season but I don't think anything will change throughout rest of the season. January is coming close. He had a chance to leave in summer. I think he stayed for new manager, new perspective, new goals...This time they should let him know they do not count on him up to level sufficient for him, put reasonable price tag so he can find another club.

In the summer mate. Never gonna happen in January.
 
Edin has a good dvoring record but Negredo offers so much more and would be picked every time.

Edin will get plenty of opportunity though, I noticed a more robust challenge from him during the derby so maybe the presence of Negredo will spur him on a bit.
 
Dzeko started 4 games this season while Negredo started only 2 !

Whats the problem then ?
 
moomba said:
Edin has a good dvoring record but Negredo offers so much more and would be picked every time.

Edin will get plenty of opportunity though, I noticed a more robust challenge from him during the derby so maybe the presence of Negredo will spur him on a bit.

It all up to personal perception. Last season many people (including Manchiny) were having Dzeko behind Tevez, Baloteli and Aguero which was nonsens and was proven otherwise. Maybe this time you are correct, however, at this moment it is not impoartant related to Dzeko's departure. He should leave anyway, can not risk to lose one more seasons/time since does not have that many to go.
 
Firasdo said:
Dzeko started 4 games this season while Negredo started only 2 !

Whats the problem then ?
Dzeko has to start every game and not be subbed off or else it's disrespectful and we'll lose.
 
pudge said:
Firasdo said:
Dzeko started 4 games this season while Negredo started only 2 !

Whats the problem then ?
Dzeko has to start every game and not be subbed off or else it's disrespectful and we'll lose.

Nobody has problem with other strikers starting ahead of Edin.

The real problem is when some of you slagging him off after MOTM performance and always praising Kun-Alvaro (Carlos and Mario before) after the similar performance.

Example is Newcastle match (MOTM) and posts like "he should have buried couple" "not good enough" "falls down pretty easy" "shouldn't start next match" "still not good", "need to improve header" etc. VS. Kun/Alvaro perfomance vs. Rags two days ago as they are "clinical" "with outstanding work rate" "not selfish" "robust and bully opposition defenders", etc. There were no any poster who criticized them after Sunday match.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top