Harry Kane

How many years left on his contract? Still another 2 at least right? Levy won't let him go.
 
People here tend to underestimate him for some reason. Harry Kane is a world-class striker. In fact the only downside it is his age, that's all. Kane cannot be disqualified because his injuries records because Haaland has been injured quite a bit so far.

Kane has the whole package and he is the perfect striker for us, in my opinion he is much more suited to our style of play than Haaland. When all the teams against us park the bus the pace of Haaland is not much impact. Kane on the other hand knows how to come from behind and deliver a world class passes as a real artist. Make no mistake, I'll be the happiest person in the world to see Halland as a city player, he has the potential to be the best player in the world in the next decade, I just think Kane is better suited.

And despite everything I've said so far, I still think Haaland is a better option because of his age. But If Harry Kane and Haaland are both 21, I really think I would go with Kane.
 
Kane & Haaland are both fantastic players and I would have been delighted with either signing.

Haaland has age on his side and he is not a Spurs player and the nonsense surrounding transfers with the master of coin.

I wanted Kane but you can’t ignore his age nor injuries. Haaland is going to be immense and can improve. He is young and has a connection with the club due to Alfie.

It’s almost like bringing one of our own home. Can’t wait.
 
wolviedinho said:
Kane & Haaland are both fantastic players and I would have been delighted with either signing.

Haaland has age on his side and he is not a Spurs player and the nonsense surrounding transfers with the master of coin.

I wanted Kane but you can’t ignore his age nor injuries. Haaland is going to be immense and can improve. He is young and has a connection with the club due to Alfie.

It’s almost like bringing one of our own home. Can’t wait.
Click to expand...
I don't get this bit Mr. Wolvie. Who's been injured more in the last couple of seasons?
 
Bluesiam said:
I don't get this bit Mr. Wolvie. Who's been injured more in the last couple of seasons?
Click to expand...
I was mainly referring to Kane’s ankles problems and his age. He could have another 4/5 season but it’s questionable. I am not exactly sure who has been injured the most over the last 2 seasons. Haaland seems to have picked up a few injuries this season.
 
City fans who say kane is past it/ dont want him/ cockney knut etc - get a fukin grip he is world class best striker or at least top 3 in world atm. We would be 10 points clear if we had him. Would have been a perfect compliment to our boys. Just coz hes a fukin southerner u would prefer not to have him. Fukin knumskulls. Idiots
 
Matt Diablo said:
City fans who say kane is past it/ dont want him/ cockney knut etc - get a fukin grip he is world class best striker or at least top 3 in world atm. We would be 10 points clear if we had him. Would have been a perfect compliment to our boys. Just coz hes a fukin southerner u would prefer not to have him. Fukin knumskulls. Idiots
Click to expand...

He is seems we getting Haaland so Kane can help spurs get top four next 5 seasons
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top