Harry Kane

bluethrunthru said:
Not to us he won't - next opportunity when Levy is desperate for cash next summer we will politely tell him we don't need his pensioner striker
Click to expand...
Yeah and you watch the fee won't be anywhere near the £150mil that's been banded about. He'll go for nearer the £100mil we've offered to our neighbours next door.
 
ancoats said:
kane bottled it and city was right to not to get mugged by levy ?? never a £150million player at his age

still plenty of time and options and if madrid had bid £130million for mbappe then maybe better going down that route ? even haaland at the same price

best thing about all of this is not so long ago manchester city could not piss in the money pot and had to settle for loans or free transfers and the club was not worth £150 million never mind one player
Click to expand...
Kiki Musampa on loan? We were pleased to get anyone in
 
End of the day he isn’t worth £150 million but we have fucked up by not having a plan b and it will cost us his season. Torres Jesus and delap will not win us the title .
 
AliBobbyJ said:
I don't know much about Daniel Levy but is it possible his unwillingness to let Kane go to City had something to do (tread carefully here) with his feelings about the ethnicity of MCFC's owners?
Click to expand...
If you don’t know much about him, then why bother making such a provocative suggestion?

Football is arguably the most international business in the world, and all Levy has done is stick fast to his valuation. Clubs disagreed on that and parties move on. No other interpretation needed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.