Harry Kane

bluethrunthru said:
Not to us he won't - next opportunity when Levy is desperate for cash next summer we will politely tell him we don't need his pensioner striker
Click to expand...
Yeah and you watch the fee won't be anywhere near the £150mil that's been banded about. He'll go for nearer the £100mil we've offered to our neighbours next door.
 
ancoats said:
kane bottled it and city was right to not to get mugged by levy ?? never a £150million player at his age

still plenty of time and options and if madrid had bid £130million for mbappe then maybe better going down that route ? even haaland at the same price

best thing about all of this is not so long ago manchester city could not piss in the money pot and had to settle for loans or free transfers and the club was not worth £150 million never mind one player
Click to expand...
Kiki Musampa on loan? We were pleased to get anyone in
 
End of the day he isn’t worth £150 million but we have fucked up by not having a plan b and it will cost us his season. Torres Jesus and delap will not win us the title .
 
AliBobbyJ said:
I don't know much about Daniel Levy but is it possible his unwillingness to let Kane go to City had something to do (tread carefully here) with his feelings about the ethnicity of MCFC's owners?
Click to expand...
If you don’t know much about him, then why bother making such a provocative suggestion?

Football is arguably the most international business in the world, and all Levy has done is stick fast to his valuation. Clubs disagreed on that and parties move on. No other interpretation needed.
 
HelloCity said:
Pep will be absolutely fuming about this.

He wanted a top striker and we couldn’t deliver.
Click to expand...

well he can’t sulk for a season like he did over Harry Maguire. All the inside info from the Spanish press close to Pep is this was Pep’s project. He didn’t want the club to go for alternatives.
They put 150 mil there for him, the club can’t be blamed for having no plan b here if they trusted Pep and Pep trusted Kane. It’s a clusterfuck really.
 
Thaksinssoldier said:
no, I was very much on the fence for Kane. But all of the above was pretty much well known.

we’ll pay a horrible price for pursuing him when you look at the above.
Click to expand...

Ffs.

Jesus and Laporte had blinders at the weekend and look very happy. No statements of dissatisfaction.

Haaland does not want a move now, he wants it next summer when it will enrich his Dad and agent. This is well known and frankly absolutely obvious given the money involved.

Messi toyed with us twice before, stated he wanted to stay in Barcelona, and would always have chosen Paris over Manchester anyway.

Aguero barely played for 2 years and is injured AGAIN. It's over for him at this level, he's an expensive passenger.

When I "look at the above" I see a load of bollocks.
 
Marvin said:
I think Kane sussed that this deal was not going to happen and so he thought that rather than be hated by Spurs and laughed at by other fans, he'd take control. He now has a workable relationship with Spurs fans. He'll still be gutted though.

Speculation will begin again around Jan window but I can't see him moving now.

Levy will regret this. Miscalculated and lost a fortune.
Click to expand...
If I were Kane though I would tell Levy that if you value me at £150m then pay me top dollar i.e. £400k+ p.w.
 
I see it as a kick in the face to all those furloughed staff at Tottenham. The club had a chance to bring in some money instead of borrowing from the government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top