Spurs (H) Post Match Thread

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by FantasyIreland, 17 Aug 2019.

  1. yeseye

    yeseye

    Joined:
    14 Feb 2008
    Messages:
    10,987
    Location:
    EARLY CROSS, CHANCE AT THE FAR POST,HINCHCLIFFE
    ‘Citeh Hooligans force 10yr old Spurs fan to drink alcohol ‘
     
  2. SatOnTheWall

    SatOnTheWall

    Joined:
    4 Aug 2013
    Messages:
    131
    Location:
    Lock my door, I only think in Blue and white
    They could have got the same wealth but those very same clubs voted not to allow it, mate. MCFC voted against ffp and were therefore in favour of the increased competition such spending would bring.

    Good posts otherwise.
     
  3. Indaparkside

    Indaparkside

    Joined:
    28 Dec 2015
    Messages:
    6,197
    Should have poured it over his head.








    Joking:)
     
    paulchapo likes this.
  4. simon23

    simon23

    Joined:
    27 May 2004
    Messages:
    12,618
    Location:
    Cornwall
    I agree that both those incidents were refd wrongly...it should have been a penalty and God knows how it wasn't a foul on Silva but reading comments like the one I was referring to is like listening to scousers........everyone is against us...blah fucking blah.

    There are always errors by refs in matches...at what every level. There will always be disagreements at what constitutes a foul or not....different human perceptions. All of this is highly likely......could there be corruption...yes there could but which is more likely....?

    There is also a difference between corruption and bias ( which is a possibility). Corruption suggests that it is institutionalised whereas bias could be individual.....I've heard(read) accusations of both
     
  5. jim tolmies perm

    jim tolmies perm

    Joined:
    1 Aug 2007
    Messages:
    3
    Well clearly from my understanding then "their" is used in the singular possessive meaning only the player who handled it and not any other member of the team
    In that case should have stood
     
    Paladin likes this.
  6. Eds

    Eds

    Joined:
    7 Nov 2005
    Messages:
    4,973
    I agree that there are always errors by referees and some you can justify i.e. view impeded by players, speed of the game etc. However the Silva freekick or lack of is hard to logically explain. What did Oliver see that nobody in the crowd saw that justified a free kick to Spurs. Silva was sandwiched in between two players and Rose also went through the back of him. The penalty can be easily explained as Oliver wasn't actually looking in that direction so should have referred to VAR as that is what it is there for!
     
  7. ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN

    ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN

    Joined:
    22 Jun 2009
    Messages:
    5,675
    Location:
    1 F in Flixton
    Walked back to car after the match and Spurs fan asked to tag along with me, missus and two kids obviously worried for his own safety.

    The lad came to the match with a coach load of Blues and was meeting up near the Townley, he said this was the reason he stopped going away matches with the agro going on.

    He seemed a decent lad and said it was as much Spurs causing the shit as much as City.

    Not all Spurs fans were dickheads like most City aren't
     
  8. kinkysdribble

    kinkysdribble

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2009
    Messages:
    448
    That's what I was posting, "NOT one pundit said it SHOULDN'T be given"
     
  9. jimharri

    jimharri

    Joined:
    30 Dec 2007
    Messages:
    89,565
    Location:
    Surrounded by the dark side of the force
    Be a terrible waste of booze.
     
    Indaparkside likes this.
  10. Proy

    Proy

    Joined:
    3 Jun 2015
    Messages:
    3,136
    And that VAR deemed that not to be a penalty is even worse and just proves the argument. Even technology that is designed to make scenarios like that right, is being and can be manipulated.

    How that wasnt a penalty after review is absolutely staggering and this is why people scream agenda. Decisions exactly like that one prove the theory.

    Oliver had a clear view of the Bernado incident. The cuñt was looking right at it.

    I dont believe we are paranoid. I dont believe we have a self entitled opinion of ourselves like like the scouse twats do.

    The decisions. The results. They are there for everyone to see. It's not a secret.
     

Share This Page