Yeah but every team wants it. Including the Scottish 2nd division.
Nobody asked the fans but you’re right, it’s absolutely brilliant watching a match and not being able to celebrate properly. What’s not to like?
Yeah but every team wants it. Including the Scottish 2nd division.
Nobody asked the fans but you’re right, it’s absolutely brilliant watching a match and not being able to celebrate properly. What’s not to like?
I recently heard some PGMOL stats. Last season 25 goals were correctly allowed/disallowed because of VAR. 25 incidents that VAR put right (that would have been just missed before VAR because we didnt have refs then). So, a referee being called over to the monitor results in what..... A correct decision? No way. According to those VAR stats it does.Human error will always occur but you're purposely avoiding 'reducing' and making out that VAR hasn't increased the amount of correct verdicts than before. Nothing with rest of your points.
Wouldn't surprise me. Foster has got enough money not to give a fuck when suggesting this.
There was a strange penalty in the Birmingham-West Brom game last night where literally nobody appealed, and even the Birmingham player who'd supposedly been fouled, thought the referee had given a Goal Kick.
Would it have been overruled by VAR?
Possibly, but possibly not, which sort of defeats the whole purpose.
I think VAR might have turned that over. But there again they might not have. Either way PGMOL would say thats VAR intervening and making the right call. Like you say, defeats the whole purpose, why have VAR when they could call it either way.
Because the lower leagues have crap officials , they need to improve a lot to be prem level , var would probably help them make the most of a shite show . Var in the prem is very differentIt just proves some posters don't understand that clubs and leagues that don't have VAR are demanding VAR because officiating is even worse without it.