Search results

What counter argument is there? I simply don't believe everyone is out to get us. Yes we've had some bad decisions against us, but we've also had some lucky decisions. Just as the rags are now getting favourable decisions, at the beginning of the season they had quite a few bad ones too. I post...

So you only post on here for approval? Funny, I post for the debate.

Laugh away. I'm not looking for approval of my believe. I'm comfortable with my own convictions.

That last statement sums up my reasoning too. This isn't 10, 20, 30 years ago...there are rarely any secrets these days so I too find it hard to believe the Prem League or whoever instruct referees to favour the bigger clubs and give decisions against the likes of ourselves. I'm not denying it...

I believe the standard of refereeing needs to improve as a whole, I just don't believe there's an agenda against us. Maybe I'll be proven wrong in future, but for me bad decisions are part of the game whether we like it or not.

LOL ! You don't even see the irony in your comment (not that morals have anything to do with it).

What's the point then eh? The whole game is corrupt. Why are we wasting our money? If you truly believe that then who's really the fool? After all, you're still spending your money to watch a corrupt/fixed sport (presuming you attend).

Ah right, sorry, didn't realise having an opinion means I have a superiority complex. By the same statement it doesn't mean the 'paranoid crap is right' either. I would suggest your statement reflects your opinion of your own comments.

A sensationalist back page headline on a red top...well I never.

Or I could carry on posting my opinion and you can kiss my arse...politely or not !

No, I don't believe there's an agenda of any sort. Call me naïve, but bad refereeing decisions are part of the game.

Attend and watch every home game thanks. Just because I've seen some bad decisions go our way doesn't mean I buy into all of the paranoid crap spewed on this forum....I've seen plenty of decisions go our way too. Anyone would think you've never seen any other game apart from a City one. Bad...

Shouldn't all be on them though. Not surprised their not arsed when no-one else joins in.

Defend, no...but I'm not going to jump on the drama bus, or the paranoid delusion bus that thinks everyone is out to get us (FIFA, UEFA, the FA, the Prem League, BBC, Sky, etc.). When did we become the scousers?

Typical paranoid statement...am getting used to them on this forum. If you really think that referees and officials go out to blatantly 'help' United, whilst blatantly 'picking on' City, then I would suggest you're the one who's thick as fuck. Only in the delusional heads of some of the fans...

See what? The Silva challenge? Just said I didn't see it properly from where I was sat. Personally I think the melo-drama is a bit too much and bored of hearing about how we're the victims and it's all a conspiracy. We've had many favourable decisions this season too which I'm sure other fans...

There's nothing contentious there. Not playing advantage...it happens. The challenge on KDB didn't warrant more than a yellow from where I was sat (right in front of it). The Silva challenge I wasn't sure of as not seen replay...and even if he was brought down, a ref missing a pen? Well I...

Tell me the shocking decisions, please. Fernadinhos challenge warranted a red but because we didn't agree at the time we were bound to get on the refs back for every little thing and blow stuff out of proportion. Was it a flawless refereeing performance? No. Have I seen many worse? Yes plenty...

That's a poor argument and if anything says that the ref who didn't send off Rojo is the bad referee. There are decisions every week which some refs would give and others wouldn't. It's always been that way and will be until video technology is used...which I think is unlikely.

I'm not even sure he was all that bad. Crowd were going to crucify him at any chance after he sent of Fernandinho, which having seen the replays was prob the right decision.