You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Who cares ?Because you've incurred an opportunity cost of £130m.
Kane is playing for them and would probably score goals for them.
Clevers
Well-Known Member
His winning the golden boot hasn't actually achieved anything for Spurs.Who cares ?
Kane is playing for them and would probably score goals for them.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Maybe this was a smokescreen so we can pursue other deals.......
...and 3 2 1 and you're back in the room.
...and 3 2 1 and you're back in the room.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
And articulate in a foreign language to boot!Exactly, it was so cringe and very unconvincing.
Compare that to the recent pre match talk we witnessed from Gundo , Fern and Dias, night and day difference, genuine and passionate.
Kane led us one merry fucking dance all summer. Levy didn't entertain a single offer and wouldn't even respond to us.
It was never happening it seems
So why was it Kane that “led us a merry dance”. Surely it was Levy
Doubt anyone will get anywhere near 100m next summer for a 29 year old striker. Got a feeling the big moves are now going to be release clause moves or free transfers as more players run down their contracts. Off topic but that might eventually mean lower salaries as clubs factor in the lack of resale value.Don't agree with that.
Kane wanted to go yes.
We didn't want any City players in exchange, just the cash.
He may be unhappy now but he's professional and will get over it. No doubt he will have another great season, his consistency is there for all to see.
He will still be worth around 100 million next summer.
I will say from the outside, I don't understand why you didn't throw the kitchen sink at Spurs for Kane, and leave Grealish. You are stacked in those positions, Grealish is a quality player but he isn't in Kane's class either goals wise or assist wise. I was saying this before today on here as well so I'm not here to rub it in or anything. Maybe Grealish has more marketing appeal or something, but for footballing reasons it doesn't make sense. Grealish will probably have a decent season, maybe even a very good one, but he won't surpass Kane output wise and creating isn't your problem, it's more finishing.
Not just staying this because, but of the two, if I had to choose, I’m glad we got Grealish and lost out on Kane. Kane is superb, but Grealish’s age, athleticism and potential - can’t wait to see how he develops.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Who?so how's AP McCoy doing these days
Are we linked with him now?